Jurisprudence against animal abuse and its applicability over bullfighting

Abstract

The animal abuse is one of the most striking problems within the society and although this legislation the animals still continue and a continuous checkout, in spite of being a subject with enough approach the laws have many contradictions that leaves without validity some other laws as it is a clear example of the law 84/89 with the law 1774/16, that due to cultural roots protects bullfighting well approaching the objectives of this project is to validate if law 1774/2016 has efficacy and applicability on bullfighting abuse and with respect to law 84/89 its applicability and its deficiencies as such the methodology used in this project is a qualitative approach with a descriptive scope using as sources the web, books and jurisprudence that is generated over time, the most important and impressive results found in the investigation was that law 1774/16 has no applicability or any efficiency with regard to bullfighting because law 84/89 of the leaves without validity in its article number nº7, where it is recited that bullfighting is not animal cruelty because it is culturally rooted and this interferes badly to someday achieve a prohibition since in Colombia and many countries are not yet ready to overcome this traditional, the municipality of Zapatoca overcame this cultural roots and finally banned bullfighting to give a quiet and dignified life to these sentient beings.